Comparia recommendation
LG C3 vs Samsung S90C
The LG OLED55C3 narrowly edges out the Samsung S90C in this WOLED vs QD-OLED head-to-head. Superior black levels, Dolby Vision support and four HDMI 2.1 ports give the LG a slight advantage, but the Samsung's higher brightness and lower price make this a genuinely close decision.
Why the LG OLED55C3 narrowly wins
Comparia analysed both TVs across five evaluation criteria: picture quality, gaming performance, smart features, HDR performance and value. Picture quality and gaming performance were weighted as critical factors, reflecting how most buyers compare these two TVs.
The LG OLED55C3 edges ahead primarily because of its WOLED panel's superior black levels and near-black handling. In dark scenes, the LG produces fractionally deeper, more precise blacks than the Samsung's QD-OLED panel. The LG also supports Dolby Vision, which Samsung omits entirely, and this matters for streaming content from Netflix, Disney+ and Apple TV+. Having four HDMI 2.1 ports instead of two gives the LG more flexibility for multi-device setups, and Dolby Vision gaming is a genuine advantage for Xbox Series X owners.
However, this is a close call at 82% confidence. The Samsung S90C fights back with significantly higher peak brightness of approximately 1300 nits versus 800, a wider colour volume thanks to its quantum dot layer and a lower price. In a bright room, the Samsung will produce a noticeably more impactful HDR picture. Both are exceptional OLEDs, and the right choice genuinely depends on your viewing environment and priorities.
Decision confidence: 82%
LG leads because
- Superior black levels and near-black precision with WOLED technology
- Dolby Vision support including Dolby Vision gaming for Xbox
- Four HDMI 2.1 ports versus two on the Samsung
Close call because
- Samsung is significantly brighter at ~1300 vs ~800 nits
- Samsung has wider colour volume with QD-OLED technology
- Samsung is approximately £100 cheaper
Best TV for every priority
Why the LG OLED55C3 edges ahead
-
Superior black levels with WOLED
The LG C3's WOLED panel turns off individual pixels completely, producing true black with zero light leakage. While the Samsung's QD-OLED also achieves excellent blacks, the LG's near-black handling is fractionally more precise. In dark cinematic content with subtle shadow detail, the LG preserves gradations that the Samsung can occasionally clip.
-
Dolby Vision across all content
The LG C3 supports Dolby Vision for streaming, Blu-ray and gaming. Samsung does not support Dolby Vision at all, relying on HDR10+ instead. Since Netflix, Disney+, Apple TV+ and most major streaming services use Dolby Vision as their primary dynamic HDR format, this is a meaningful advantage for the LG in everyday use.
-
Four HDMI 2.1 ports
The LG C3 has four full-bandwidth HDMI 2.1 ports, while the Samsung S90C has two. If you connect a PS5, Xbox Series X, gaming PC and soundbar, the LG handles all of them without needing to swap cables. This is a practical advantage that many buyers overlook until they run out of ports.
-
Dolby Vision gaming for Xbox
The LG C3 supports Dolby Vision gaming at 4K 120Hz, which is exclusive to a small number of TVs. Xbox Series X owners benefit from richer HDR in supported titles. The Samsung cannot match this because it does not support Dolby Vision at all.
-
webOS is cleaner and more reliable
LG's webOS smart platform is widely regarded as more user-friendly than Samsung's Tizen. The interface is clean, app loading is fast and there are fewer intrusive advertisements. Samsung has drawn criticism for integrating ads into the Tizen home screen on premium televisions.
Where the Samsung S90C wins
-
Significantly higher brightness
The S90C reaches approximately 1300 nits peak brightness compared to the LG's 800 nits. In a bright living room with large windows, this difference is clearly visible. HDR highlights are more impactful and the overall picture retains punch in ambient light.
-
Wider colour volume with QD-OLED
Samsung's quantum dot colour conversion layer produces a wider colour gamut than LG's colour filter approach. Reds, greens and blues are more saturated and vivid. For colourful content like nature documentaries and animated films, the Samsung's palette is more striking.
-
HDR10+ support
While HDR10+ has a smaller content library than Dolby Vision, it is the preferred format on Amazon Prime Video. If you watch a lot of Prime Video content, the Samsung's HDR10+ support is a genuine advantage.
-
Lower price
At approximately £999, the Samsung S90C is roughly £100 cheaper than the LG C3. You get QD-OLED technology with superior brightness for less money, which represents excellent value.
Choose based on your setup
This decision comes down to your viewing environment, connected devices and content preferences.
Choose the LG OLED55C3 if
- · You watch in a dimmed or dark room most of the time
- · Dolby Vision streaming and gaming matter to you
- · You need four HDMI 2.1 ports for multiple devices
Choose the Samsung S90C if
- · Your living room is bright with lots of natural light
- · You prioritise colour vibrancy and brightness over black depth
- · You want to save approximately £100 on a premium OLED
What would change this recommendation
If you watch mainly in a bright room
Samsung S90C becomes the better choice. Its ~1300 nit brightness advantage is clearly visible in ambient light.
If you own an Xbox Series X
LG C3 pulls further ahead. Dolby Vision gaming at 4K 120Hz is a significant advantage that the Samsung cannot match.
If Amazon Prime Video is your main service
Samsung S90C becomes more compelling. HDR10+ is Prime Video's preferred dynamic HDR format.
If budget is the primary constraint
Samsung S90C wins. You get QD-OLED with superior brightness for approximately £100 less.
Full specifications compared
| Specification | LG OLED55C3 | Samsung S90C |
|---|---|---|
| Panel type | WOLED | QD-OLED |
| Resolution | 4K (3840 x 2160) | 4K (3840 x 2160) |
| Refresh rate | 120Hz | 120Hz |
| HDMI 2.1 ports | 4 | 2 |
| HDR formats | Dolby Vision, HDR10, HLG | HDR10, HDR10+, HLG |
| Peak brightness | ~800 nits | ~1300 nits |
| Contrast | Infinite (per-pixel) | Infinite (per-pixel) |
| Smart platform | webOS | Tizen |
| Input lag (Game mode) | ~9.5ms | ~9.2ms |
| Approx. price | £1099 | £999 |
| Comparia score | 8.8/10 | 8.5/10 |
Where to buy the LG OLED55C3
Prices are approximate and may vary. Some links are affiliate links which help support Comparia at no cost to you.
How Comparia evaluated this comparison
Black levels, contrast, colour accuracy and overall image fidelity are the most important factors when comparing premium OLEDs.
Input lag, HDMI 2.1 features, VRR support and HDR gaming capabilities are key differentiators at this price point.
The smart platform, app ecosystem and interface quality affect daily usability for every viewer.
Peak brightness, tone mapping and dynamic HDR format support determine how well HDR content is displayed.
Both TVs are premium products. The price difference is modest but worth noting for buyers on a budget.
LG C3 vs Samsung S90C: head-to-head scores
A criterion-by-criterion breakdown of how both TVs scored in Comparia's weighted analysis.
8.8/10
8.5/10
LG OLED55C3 wins for
- · Superior black levels with WOLED technology
- · Dolby Vision support (Samsung lacks it entirely)
- · Four HDMI 2.1 ports versus two
- · Dolby Vision gaming for Xbox Series X
Samsung S90C wins for
- · Higher peak brightness (~1300 vs ~800 nits)
- · Wider colour volume with QD-OLED technology
- · HDR10+ support for Amazon Prime Video
- · Lower price at approximately £999
Detailed analysis
Picture quality
Picture quality is the most heavily weighted criterion and the area where WOLED and QD-OLED differ most fundamentally.
The LG OLED55C3 scores 9/10. Its WOLED panel uses a white OLED emitter with colour filters to produce red, green and blue subpixels. Each of the 8.3 million pixels can be turned off individually, creating perfect blacks with zero light leakage. The C3's near-black handling is exceptionally precise, preserving subtle shadow gradations in dark content without the slight raised black level that QD-OLED panels can exhibit. Colour accuracy out of the box is excellent, covering 98.5% of DCI-P3 with a neutral, faithful colour temperature that favours accuracy over vibrancy.
The Samsung S90C scores 8/10. Its QD-OLED panel uses a blue OLED emitter with quantum dot colour conversion layers instead of filters. This produces a wider colour gamut than WOLED, with more saturated reds and greens. The visual effect is punchier and more vivid, which many viewers prefer. However, Samsung's colour tuning leans toward vibrancy over accuracy, and the near-black handling is marginally less precise than the LG's. QD-OLED panels can also exhibit subtle colour fringing on very fine text at close viewing distances, though this is rarely noticeable during normal content viewing.
Gaming performance
Both TVs are exceptional for gaming, but the LG C3 has a practical edge in connectivity and HDR gaming.
The LG OLED55C3 scores 9/10 for gaming. It delivers approximately 9.5ms input lag in game mode at 4K 120Hz, supports VRR via both HDMI-VRR and AMD FreeSync Premium, and has four HDMI 2.1 ports. The standout feature is Dolby Vision gaming at 4K 120Hz, which is available on Xbox Series X and produces a richer, more dynamic HDR picture in supported titles than standard HDR10. Having four HDMI 2.1 ports means you can connect two consoles, a gaming PC and a soundbar simultaneously without swapping cables.
The Samsung S90C scores 9/10 as well. Input lag is fractionally lower at approximately 9.2ms, and the higher peak brightness makes HDR gaming content more impactful in a lit room. Samsung's Game Bar overlay provides quick access to gaming settings. However, having only two HDMI 2.1 ports is a genuine limitation for multi-device gaming setups, and the lack of Dolby Vision means Xbox Series X owners miss out on the best HDR gaming experience.
Smart features
The LG OLED55C3 scores 9/10 for its webOS platform. The interface is clean, navigation is intuitive and app loading times are fast. Netflix launches in approximately 2 seconds, and the platform supports AirPlay 2 and Chromecast for flexible streaming. LG also offers Netflix Calibrated Mode, a dedicated picture preset developed with Netflix that matches their post-production mastering environment.
The Samsung S90C scores 8/10 with Tizen. The platform is technically capable and fast, with good app support and a modern interface. However, Samsung integrates advertising into the Tizen home screen on premium televisions, which detracts from the premium experience. The ads can be minimised through settings but not eliminated entirely. Samsung does offer a wider range of free streaming channels through Samsung TV Plus.
HDR performance
HDR performance is where the two TVs diverge most sharply, and where the brightness versus contrast trade-off is most visible.
The LG OLED55C3 scores 8/10. Its Dolby Vision processing is excellent, adjusting tone mapping dynamically scene by scene using Dolby's metadata. However, peak brightness of approximately 800 nits means HDR specular highlights are less punchy than the Samsung. In a dark room, the LG's infinite contrast makes HDR content look stunning because the dynamic range between black and peak brightness is so wide. In a bright room, the Samsung's advantage becomes more apparent.
The Samsung S90C scores 9/10. At approximately 1300 nits, it pushes HDR highlights significantly harder. Bright explosions, sunlight and metallic reflections are more impactful. The QD-OLED panel also displays a wider colour volume in HDR, meaning it can show bright, saturated colours that the LG cannot reach. The trade-off is that Samsung uses HDR10+ instead of Dolby Vision, which has a smaller content library across streaming services.
Value
The Samsung S90C scores 8/10 for value at approximately £999. For this price, you get a QD-OLED panel with class-leading brightness, excellent gaming performance and a wide colour gamut. It is difficult to argue against the Samsung's price-to-performance ratio.
The LG OLED55C3 scores 7/10 at approximately £1099. The £100 premium buys you Dolby Vision support, four HDMI 2.1 ports and superior black levels. Whether these extras justify the additional cost depends entirely on your priorities. If you own an Xbox Series X, use Netflix as your primary streaming service or connect multiple devices, the LG's extras are worth the premium. If you prioritise brightness and want to spend less, the Samsung is the smarter purchase.
Where to buy both options
Frequently asked questions
Is the LG C3 or Samsung S90C better for movies?
Is the LG C3 or Samsung S90C better for gaming?
What is the difference between WOLED and QD-OLED?
Does the Samsung S90C support Dolby Vision?
Which has the better smart platform, webOS or Tizen?
Which TV is better value for money?
Explore this decision
Related TV comparisons and buying guides
Users also compared
Best OLED TV
Winner: LG OLED65C3
Sony A80L vs Samsung S90C
Winner: Sony A80L
Best TV for Netflix
Winner: LG OLED65C3
Best TV for gaming under £1000
Winner: LG OLED48C3
Best TV under £1000
Winner: LG OLED55C2
Best camera phone
Winner: iPhone 15 Pro Max
Not finding what you need?
Compare your own options on Comparia. Enter any decision and get AI-powered analysis in seconds.
How Comparia works
Comparia is an AI decision engine that helps you make confident choices. Recommendations are generated by analysing product specifications, verified benchmarks and structured trade-off reasoning.
Transparency
Comparia does not accept payment from manufacturers. Recommendations are based on weighted criteria analysis, not editorial opinion. Some retailer links are affiliate links which help support Comparia at no cost to you. Affiliate relationships never influence scoring, ranking or recommendations.
Methodology
Each product is scored 1 to 10 on each criterion. Criteria are weighted by importance (critical, important, nice to have). The overall score is a weighted average. Trade-offs are identified by comparing where each option leads and trails.
This decision page was generated by Comparia's AI analysis engine and is reviewed for accuracy. Prices and availability are approximate. Last updated: March 2026.